skip to content
zerolive account
.

agentops audit.

30 day wedge

for teams shipping agents into production before their evidence, permissions, evals, and rollback loops are mature enough.

a failure audit for production agents

ZERO was built around a live system that can lose money if an agent trusts stale data, repeats a bad loop, or ships an unreviewed change. The audit packages those internal scars into a product for teams running coding agents, research agents, trading agents, support agents, or workflow agents with real blast radius.

Price: $4,800 fixed fee for the first five customers. Timeline: 10 business days. Output: one report, one walkthrough, one remediation backlog, and one optional implemented guardrail.

what zero already proves

transferable engine mechanisms
areaevidencerisk caught
tool surfaceMCP tools, tier gates, agent onboardingoverpowered agents in prod
evidence loopdecisions, rejections, near misses, genomechanges made from anecdotes
risk gateshard stops, circuit breakers, veto rolessilent unsafe automation
replayshadow decisions, counterfactual sizing, auditsno proof a fix would help
operator memoryscars, reports, changelog, runbooksthe same incident twice

what the buyer receives

  • Agent capability inventory: tools, permissions, memory, evals, and production paths.
  • Failure-mode map: stale state, runaway loops, silent exceptions, permission drift, missing rollback.
  • Evidence audit: what is logged, what is replayable, what cannot be proven after an incident.
  • Risk gate review: hard limits, human approvals, kill switches, rate limits, and blast radius.
  • 30-day fix plan: the smallest changes that reduce production risk without slowing the team down.

example findings

audit excerpt
severityfindingrecommended fix
highagent can call write tools before it has produced trustworthy read-only evidenceprogressive tool surface: observe -> inspect -> propose -> operate
higheval pass rate is not correlated with downstream outcomestrack outcome deltas by eval family before promoting policy changes
mediumincident reports exist, but scars do not block repeated failure patternsturn scars into promotion brakes and preflight checks
mediumlogs prove activity, not causalityattach input hashes, decision context, and next-action provenance to every agent action

how the first call works

  1. You provide a repo, agent runbook, tool manifest, eval traces, and 3-5 recent incidents or near misses.
  2. We run a structured pass over source, prompts, tools, permissions, logs, memory, evals, and deployment paths.
  3. You get a written audit, a live walkthrough, a risk heat map, and a ranked 30-day remediation plan.
  4. Optional: we implement one guardrail or observability wedge so the report changes behavior immediately.

sales script and success criteria

Email opener: "You are giving agents more tools than your evidence loop can supervise. I can run a 10-day AgentOps Audit that maps tool permissions, eval evidence, memory, incident paths, and rollback gaps, then returns the top five guardrails to build next."

Validation target: book 10 calls, close 2 paid audits, find 3 repeated failure modes across customer systems, and convert at least one audit finding into a reusable product check.

request the audit